Friday 11 October 2013

Impact of the highly improbable – Part 6

We saw in the previous post how the English East India Trading Company started expanding its territories and how the Mughal dynasty fell.

Though the Company was becoming increasingly bold and ambitious in putting down resisting states, it was getting clearer that the Company was incapable of governing the vast expanse of the captured territories

The Bengal famine of 1770, in which one-third of the local population died, caused distress in Britain.

At around the same time The Tea Act was passed in 1773. It gave the Company greater autonomy in running its trade in America, and allowed it an exemption from the tea tax which its colonial competitors were required to pay.

The Act granted the Company the right to directly ship its tea to North America and the right to the duty-free export of tea from Britain, although the tax imposed by the Townshend Acts and collected in the colonies remained in force.  The Act received the royal assent on May 10, 1773.

This became one of the major causes for American Revolution

It started with the Boston Tea Party

The Tea Party was the culmination of a resistance movement throughout British America against the Tea Act, which had been passed by the British Parliament in 1773. Colonists objected to the Tea Act because they believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to "No taxation without representation," that is they had to be taxed only by their own elected representatives and not by a British parliament in which they were not represented. Protesters had successfully prevented the unloading of taxed tea in three other colonies, but in Boston, embattled Royal Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused to allow the tea to be returned to Britain. (Source: Wikipedia)

Depiction of Boston Tea Party (Source: Wikipedia)





This iconic 1846 lithograph by Nathaniel Currier was entitled "The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor"; the phrase "Boston Tea Party" had not yet become standard. Interestingly this depiction shows few of the men dumping the tea were actually disguised as Indians. (Source: Wikipedia)




The notice from the "Chairman of the Committee for Tarring and Feathering" in Boston denounced the tea consignees as "traitors to their country". (Source: Wikipedia)





The Boston Tea Party was a key event in the growth of the American Revolution.

The Boston Tea Party has often been referenced in other political protests. When Mohandas K. Gandhi led a mass burning of Indian registration cards in South Africa in 1908, a British newspaper compared the event to the Boston Tea Party. When Gandhi met with the British viceroy in 1930 after the Indian salt protest campaign, Gandhi took some duty-free salt from his shawl and said, with a smile, that the salt was "to remind us of the famous Boston Tea Party."

In 1973 the US Post Office issued a set of four stamps, together making one scene of the Boston Tea Party (Source: Wikipedia)



As we can see the policies which were thought as a boon by the Company at that point of time actually became a bane because they failed to see the hidden black swan. They never realized that it would invoke such a huge resentment.

The English East India Trading Company did not learn from what had happened to the Mughals. It too ignored many black swans which indicated that their days were numbered.

For instance, The Parliament of Great Britain imposed a series of administrative and economic reforms and by doing so clearly established its sovereignty and ultimate control over the Company. The Act recognized the Company's political functions and clearly established that the "acquisition of sovereignty by the subjects of the Crown is on behalf of the Crown and not in its own right”.

The above was a clear indication of Great Britain’s intention of how the company should be and it did not like the way it was functioning. After all it was getting too ambitious.

Often policies are created without considering the impacts. And when the effect is felt it is the human ego which prevents the reversal. Men in power try to suppress to make the policy work. But unfortunately it doesn’t go well that way. Like the Tallow greased cartridges (which affected the religious sentiments) and the Doctrine of Lapse of East India Trading Company

The above two mentioned policies were triggering factors of the Sepoy Mutiny. This rebellion is also known as India's First War of Independence, the Great Rebellion or the Indian Mutiny.

Depiction of Sepoy Mutiny 1857 (Source: Wikipedia)





The Indian Rebellion of 1857 did not occur as a result of one specific event; it was an accumulation of several events, over time, resulting in its eventual outbreak.

We would now look at two important events in the first war of Indian Independence.

I would term these two events as, “The Cartridge Effect” and “The Bundelkand Effect”.

Two personalities are intimately connected to these events.

Who were they? And what did they do?

And what went so wrong in the policies that it led to the dissolution of the Company?


To be continued…